Binding of single-mutant epidermal growth factor (EGF) ligands alters the stability of the EGF receptor dimer and promotes growth signaling

نویسندگان

چکیده

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a membrane-anchored tyrosine kinase that able to selectively respond multiple extracellular stimuli. Previous studies have indicated the modularity of this system may be caused by ligand-induced differences in stability dimer. However, hypothesis has not been explored using single-mutant ligands thus far. Herein, we developed new approach identify residues responsible for functional divergence selecting (EGF) ligand are conserved among orthologs yet divergent between paralogs. Then, mutated these and assessed mutants' effects on combination molecular dynamics (MD) biochemical techniques. Although EGF mutants had binding affinities EGFR comparable with WT ligand, showed differential patterns phosphorylation cell lines. MD simulations mutations long-range dimer interface. This study shows first time single mutation sufficient alter activation signaling pathway at cellular level. These results also support biased ligand–receptor can lead downstream outcomes demonstrate promising method interactions. (EGF)-like domain involved many biological events multicellular organisms (1Gazdar A.F. Activating resistance non-small-cell lung cancer: Role clinical response inhibitors.Oncogene. 2009; 28: S24-S31Crossref PubMed Scopus (681) Google Scholar). constituted one (epidermal [EGFR]) seven distinct peptide (EGF; heparin-binding [HBEGF]; epigen [EPGN]; betacellulin [BTC]; epiregulin [EREG]; amphiregulin [AREG]; transforming factor-alpha [TGFA]). Upon receptor, activate intracellular pathways through network intramolecular interactions several feedback loops (2Oda K. Matsuoka Y. Funahashi A. Kitano H. A comprehensive map signaling.Mol. Syst. Biol. 2005; 1 (2005.0010)Crossref (800) For all ligands, induces transition from monomer or inactive an active state (3Landau M. Fleishman S.J. Ben-Tal N. putative mechanism downregulation catalytic activity via direct contact its C-terminal domains.Structure. 2004; 12: 2265-2275Abstract Full Text PDF (53) Scholar, 4Purba E.R. Saita E.I. Maruyama I.N. Activation oncogenic mutations: "Rotation model".Cells. 2017; 6: 13Crossref (82) different promote outcomes, even saturating concentrations; thus, modular independent affinity potency likely encompasses intrinsic (5Wilson K.J. Gilmore J.L. Foley J. Lemmon M.A. Riese 2nd., D.J. Functional selectivity family factors: Implications cancer.Pharmacol. Ther. 122: 1-8Crossref (158) It well known plays key role cancer development. In particular, some shown overexpression induce types (6Nicholson R.I. Gee J.M. Harper M.E. prognosis.Eur. Cancer. 2001; 37 Suppl 4: S9-S15Abstract better understanding interaction could development targeted therapies (7Xu M.J. Johnson D.E. Grandis J.R. EGFR-targeted post-genomic era.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 36: 463-473Crossref (100) Protein–protein interactions, such as well-studied examples coevolution systems. sometimes defined part (receptor) binds counterparts (ligands). instances, receptors experience selective constraints, where tend evolve more slowly because necessity (8Alvarez-Ponce D. Feyertag F. Chakraborty S. Position matters: Network centrality considerably impacts rates protein evolution human protein-protein network.Genome Evol. 9: 1742-1756Crossref (19) Furthermore, paralogs, proteins related duplication event, less retain same function orthologs, speciation event (9Jensen R.A. Orthologs paralogs - need get it right.Genome 2 (Interactions1002)Crossref paralogous rather than good candidate test system. susceptible indirect factors, selectivity, resulting unrelated pathways. work, decided EGF, identifying modifying sites paralog ligands. Recent Arg-41 Leu-47 highly important high (10Groenen L.C. Nice E.C. Burgess A.W. Structure-function-relationships EGF/TGF-alpha mitogens.Growth Factors. 1994; 11: 235-257Crossref (215) Another highlighted Tyr-13, Leu-15, His-16 essential ErbB1 (11Souriau C. Gracy Chiche L. Weill Direct selection displayed filamentous phage cells overexpressing receptor.Biol. Chem. 1999; 380: 451-458Crossref (17) were based structural analyses experimental validation. bioinformatic tools prediction (12Skwark Raimondi Michel Elofsson Improved predictions recognition like patterns.PLoS Comput. 2014; 10e1003889Crossref (116) Scholar) (13Gocheva G. Ivanova look receptor-ligand pairs active-targeting drug delivery crystallographic perspectives.Mol. Pharm. 2019; 16: 3293-3321Crossref (9) give overall picture contribution still remains unclear. Ligand-induced observed G protein–coupled receptors, phenomenon “biased signaling” (14Evans B.A. Sato Sarwar Hutchinson D.S. Summers R.J. Ligand-directed signalling beta-adrenoceptors.Br. Pharmacol. 2010; 159: 1022-1038Crossref (123) 15Kenakin T. signaling.J. Exp. 2011; 336: 296-302Crossref (389) recent report hints might take place (16Ali R. Brown W. Purdy S.C. Davisson V.J. Wendt M.K. Biased regulates proliferative versus apoptotic ligand.Cell Death Dis. 2018; 976Crossref (8) Initially, main contributor was thought receptor. discovery EPGN, which potent mitogen effect despite low (17Strachan Murison J.G. Prestidge R.L. Sleeman Watson J.D. Kumble K.D. Cloning epigen, novel member superfamily.J. 276: 18265-18271Abstract Scholar), line changed perspective. plausible explanation initially formulated Wilson et al. stabilities, altering dynamics. Later, evidence supported theory observing transient stable dimers induced whereas weak EPGN EREG persisted longer (18Freed D.M. Bessman N.J. Kiyatkin Salazar-Cavazos E. Byrne P.O. Moore J.O. Valley C.C. Ferguson K.M. Leahy Lidke differentially stabilize specify kinetics.Cell. 171: 683-695.e618Abstract (139) difference stabilities result alterations oligomerization state, previously determinant pattern (19Huang Bharill Karandur Peterson S.M. Marita Shi X. Kaliszewski Smith Isacoff E.Y. Kuriyan Molecular basis multimerization receptor.Elife. 2016; 5e14107Crossref (96) Now, open question how stabilities. Interactions interface influence dimerized (20Mehrabi Mahdiuni Rasouli Mansouri Shahlaei Khodarahmi Comparative experimental/theoretical dimerization under EGF/EGF analogues binding: Highlighting importance EGF/EGFR site III interface.Int. Macromol. 115: 401-417Crossref (5) ligand-specific bias 21Knudsen S.L. Mac A.S. Henriksen van Deurs B. Grovdal L.M. regulated ligands.Growth 32: 155-163Crossref (35) symmetrical, “flush” conformation asymmetrical, “staggered” (22Liu P. Cleveland T.E.t. Bouyain Longo P.A. dimers.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. 2012; 109: 10861-10866Crossref (86) depending presence/absence membrane, glycosylation, number bound (23Arkhipov Shan Kim E.T. Shaw Membrane contributes negative cooperativity receptor.PLoS 10e1003742Crossref Whether unknown. Here, show amino acid substitutions EGF–EGFR We tool analyze pair function-altering mutations. identified altered phenotype (Fig. 1). explain single-residue mutants. our coevolutionary analysis applied readily other First, predicting sharing common interactor (referred now on). called DIRpred (divergence-inducing residue prediction). Our combines residue-specific conservation measures positions while diverging assumption specific whether either reasons, denotes (the shared property ligands). Thus, but ligand's function. Unlike existing methods specificity determining (a review found (24Chagoyen García-Martín J.A. Pazos Practical specificity-determining families.Brief. Bioinform. 2015; 17: 255-261Crossref (21) Scholar)), included interprotein narrow down those interaction. score calculated sum four components (I: conservation, II: complement paralog's III: coevolution, IV: internal coevolution). Optionally, conducted alignment (multiple [MSTA]) instead sequence (MSA). An implementation done Python. pipeline accepts structure alignments reference conduct analysis. output consists tabular file containing individual scores combined each site, plotted recap S1). algorithm predict 2). Because requires prior knowledge target gene, performed phylogenetic confirm reported monophyletic S2). tree used statistical validation scores. random 53–amino acid–long evolved 100 times Pyvolve (25Spielman Wilke C.O. Pyvolve: flexible Python module simulating sequences along phylogenies.PLoS One. 10e0139047Crossref (41) Assuming distribution will normal, estimated probability without constraints would higher (p-value) (26Chakrabarti Bryant S.H. Panchenko A.R. lies within properties evolutionary changes acids.J. Mol. 2007; 373: 801-810Crossref S3, Table Asn-32, Asp-46, Lys-48, Trp-50 potential candidates divergence. Asn-32 Lys-48 very small both partial (II). Asp-46 relatively (III), S4).Figure 2DIRpred EGF. A, relative ranking outer circle represents (MSA)-based scores, inner (MSTA)-based darker color indicates site-based scoring. values S2. B, cross-conservation plot. plot obtained crossing two Interestingly, no point bottom right half (high ortholog conservation), suggesting independent. observation points out there organism-specific adaptation C, cross-coevolution score. (L-R) (III) y axis ligand–ligand (L-L) (IV) x axis. DIRpred, divergence-inducing prediction; factor.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Three mentioned previous reports; however, none them individually mutated. tryptophan position 50 strong outlier bioinformatics analysis, Trp-49 Their when do type change into account (data shown). testing outward-facing position, buried contacts (27Gallay Vincent Li de la Sierra I.M. Alvarez Ubieta Madrazo Padron Protein flexibility aggregation factor. time-resolved fluorescence native engineered single-tryptophan mutants.Eur. Biochem. 1993; 211: 213-219Crossref (16) facilitating membrane phospholipids, happens Pro-7 Leu-8 (28Tynan C.J. Roberts S.K. Rolfe Clarke D.T. Loeffler H.H. Kastner Winn M.D. Parker P.J. Martin-Fernandez M.L. Human aligned plasma adopts features Drosophila asymmetry.Mol. Cell 31: 2241-2252Crossref (30) Scholar); burying inside bilayer solution alone (29Li De La Gallay Interaction recombinant phospholipid vesicles. steady-state bis-tryptophan (TRP49-TRP50).Eur. Biophys. 1992; 21: 337-344Crossref (6) although complex example, achieved formation helix, clustering together Val-34 Arg-45 around (30Hommel Harvey T.S. Driscoll P.C. Campbell I.D. High resolution comparison alpha.J. 227: 271-282Crossref (119) Mutation N32R slightly probably due presence guanidinium group R positively charged interact Gln-16 (ECD) S5). corresponding chicken mitogenicity strongly affecting (31Puddicombe Chamberlin S.G. MacGarvie Richter Drummond D.R. Collins Wood Davies significance valine 33 epitope 1996; 271: 15367-15372Abstract (12) literature about before, (32Lahti Lui B.H. Beck S.E. Lee S.S. Ly D.P. Longaker M.T. Yang G.P. Cochran Engineered faster on-rates correlate enhanced activation.FEBS Lett. 585: 1135-1139Crossref (15) Next, manually chose introduce factors. decision given alignment, considering divided groups their kinetics parameters After that, selected infers significant When choices possible, priority ones Freed al designed amino-acid substitution characterization N32R, D46T, K48T, W50Y. To determine integrity secondary substitutions, vitro CD spectroscopy maintained S6). β-sheet content (ranging 0.41 0.54 %) substantially (0.44%), varies. surprising only beta sheet detected CD, (53 acids) β-sheets connected loop regions C N termini flanking. tested ability mutant bind soluble ECD EGFR, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) microscale thermophoresis. analogously sample experiments 3). steeper experiments, did appear affect shed light outcome short-term response, sampled expression amount phosphorylated (pEGFR) A431 cells. epidermoid carcinoma overexpresses EGFR. reason, postulated any level amplified. measured total timesteps Western blot (WB) after treating concentrations (100 nM) 4). Remarkably, D46T reduced pEGFR up 30 min treatment 4A). Meanwhile, bands K48T W50Y samples stronger three timesteps. significant. cross-linking assay, follows similar trend 4B). h 6 h, reduction compared control S7). marked samples. inverse relationship quantity, fact explained theory. least ligand. indicate possible alteration recycling observe long-term phenotype, assay IncuCyte live-cell fibroblast lines (Bj5-tα Albino Swiss mouse 3T3). With platform, measuring population, Annexin V green reagent induction apoptosis. day initial incubation, subjected 1, 10, nM concentration Treating Bj5-tα fibroblasts resulted highest proliferation rate control. accompanied morphology signal differentiation (Data decreased suppress 5A). differed most S8A). 3T3 S8B). lines, dependent S9). further apoptosis exhibit treated (>10 (33Gulli L.F. Palmer K.C. Chen Y.Q. Reddy K.B. Epidermal factor-induced reversed reducing activity.Cell Growth Differ. 7: 173-178PubMed decrease population 48 WT, intermediate Cells closest 5B). cells, cell's globular processes increased ratio confluence S10). D46T- K48T-treated signs 5C), S11, Data Significantly, display transduction mechanism. disrupting “loss symmetry” model symmetrical short-lived nature signaling, asymmetric sustained activation, lasting 24 h. Such provides causes modifications behavior experiments. Compared variant constantly lower signal, possibly stable, e

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor kinase-independent signaling by EGF.

The ErbB family of receptors, which includes the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4, mediate signaling by EGF-like polypeptides. To better understand the role of the EGFR tyrosine kinase, we analyzed signaling by a kinase-inactive EGFR (K721M) in ErbB-devoid 32D cells. K721M alone exhibited no detectable signaling capacity, whereas coexpression of K721M with ErbB2,...

متن کامل

Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats of human tenascin-C as ligands for EGF receptor

Signaling through growth factor receptors controls such diverse cell functions as proliferation, migration, and differentiation. A critical question has been how the activation of these receptors is regulated. Most, if not all, of the known ligands for these receptors are soluble factors. However, as matrix components are highly tissue-specific and change during development and pathology, it ha...

متن کامل

Activation of insulin-epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor chimerae regulates EGF receptor binding affinity

Cell surface tyrosine kinase receptors are subject to a rapid activation by their ligand, which is followed by secondary regulatory processes. The IHE2 cell line is a unique model system to study the regulation of EGF binding to EGF receptors after activation of the EGF receptor kinase. IHE2 cells express both a chimeric insulin-EGF receptor kinase (IER) and a kinase-deficient EGF receptor (HER...

متن کامل

Conformational stability of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor as influenced by glycosylation, dimerization and EGF hormone binding.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important transmembrane glycoprotein kinase involved the initiation or perpetuation of signal transduction cascades within cells. These processes occur after EGFR binds to a ligand [epidermal growth factor (EGF)], thus inducing its dimerization and tyrosine autophosphorylation. Previous publications have highlighted the importance of glycosylati...

متن کامل

Heparin-dependent binding and autophosphorylation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor by heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor but not by EGF.

Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) is a recently identified member of the EGF family of growth factors and a potent mitogen for smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells genetically engineered to express the human EGF receptor bind with high affinity both EGF and HB-EGF. CHO mutant cells lacking heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) bind EGF equally well...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Biological Chemistry

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1083-351X', '0021-9258', '1067-8816']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100872